ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Lightweight Reinforcement Learning for Priority-Aware Spectrum Management in Vehicular IoT Networks.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Vehicular Internet of Things (V-IoT) has emerged as a cornerstone of next-generation intelligent transportation systems (ITSs), enabling applications ranging from safety-critical collision avoidance and cooperative awareness to infotainment and fleet management. These heterogeneous services impose stringent quality-of-service (QoS) demands for latency, reliability, and fairness while competing for limited and dynamically varying spectrum resources. Conventional schedulers, such as round-robin or static priority queues, lack adaptability, whereas deep reinforcement learning (DRL) solutions, though powerful, remain computationally intensive and unsuitable for real-time roadside unit (RSU) deployment. This paper proposes a lightweight and interpretable reinforcement learning (RL)-based spectrum management framework for Vehicular Internet of Things (V-IoT) networks. Two enhanced Q-Learning variants are introduced: a Value-Prioritized Action Double Q-Learning with Constraints (VPADQ-C) algorithm that enforces reliability and blocking constraints through a Constrained Markov Decision Process (CMDP) with online primal-dual optimization, and a contextual Q-Learning with Upper Confidence Bound (Q-UCB) method that integrates uncertainty-aware exploration and a Success-Rate Prior (SRP) to accelerate convergence. A Risk-Aware Heuristic baseline is also designed as a transparent, low-complexity benchmark to illustrate the interpretability-performance trade-off between rule-based and learning-driven approaches. A comprehensive simulation framework incorporating heterogeneous traffic classes, physical-layer fading, and energy-consumption dynamics is developed to evaluate throughput, delay, blocking probability, fairness, and energy efficiency. The results demonstrate that the proposed methods consistently outperform conventional Q-Learning and Double Q-Learning methods. VPADQ-C achieves the highest energy efficiency (≈8.425×107 bits/J) and reduces interruption probability by over 60%, while Q-UCB achieves the fastest convergence (within ≈190 episodes), lowest blocking probability (≈0.0135), and lowest mean delay (≈0.351 ms). Both schemes maintain fairness near 0.364, preserve throughput around 28 Mbps, and exhibit sublinear training-time scaling with O(1) per-update complexity and O(N2) overall runtime growth. Scalability analysis confirms that the proposed frameworks sustain URLLC-grade latency (<0.2 ms) and reliability under dense vehicular loads, validating their suitability for real-time, large-scale V-IoT deployments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.