ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Electro-Oculography and Proprioceptive Calibration Enable Horizontal and Vertical Gaze Estimation, Even with Eyes Closed.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Viewpoint: Next-Generation Sensor Technologies for Studying Mental Health.IEEE sensors letters · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eye movement is an important tool used to investigate cognition. It also serves as input in human-computer interfaces for assistive technology. It can be measured with camera-based eye tracking and electro-oculography (EOG). EOG does not rely on eye visibility and can be measured even when the eyes are closed. We investigated the feasibility of detecting the gaze direction using EOG while having the eyes closed. A total of 15 participants performed a proprioceptive calibration task with open and closed eyes, while their eye movement was recorded with a camera-based eye tracker and with EOG. The calibration was guided by the participants' hand motions following a pattern of felt dots on cardboard. Our cross-correlation analysis revealed reliable temporal synchronization between gaze-related signals and the instructed trajectory across all conditions. Statistical comparison tests and equivalence tests demonstrated that EOG tracking was statistically equivalent to the camera-based eye tracker gaze direction during the eyes-open condition. The camera-based eye-tracking glasses do not support tracking with closed eyes. Therefore, we evaluated the EOG-based gaze estimates during the eyes-closed trials by comparing them to the instructed trajectory. The results showed that EOG signals, guided by proprioceptive cues, followed the instructed path and achieved a significantly greater accuracy than shuffled control data, which represented a chance-level performance. This demonstrates the advantage of EOG when camera-based eye tracking is infeasible, and it paves the way for the development of eye-movement input interfaces for blind people, research on eye movement direction when the eyes are closed, and the early detection of diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.