ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Metabolic Syndrome Detection Based on Classification of Electrocardiography Signals.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fusion of RR Interval Dynamics and HRV Multidomain Signatures Using Multimodal Neural Models for Metabolic Syndrome Classification.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Metabolic syndrome (MS) components, mainly correlated with insulin resistance and diabetes, constitute physiological disturbances that are objectively detectable based on physiological and anatomical measurements. In particular, the scientific literature indicates clear associations between features extracted from electrocardiograph (ECG) signals and MS. However, there exist few scientific studies related to MS detection by means of ECG signals, specially in automatic computer aided systems. This paper aims at developing and evaluating automatic tools for possible MS detection based on ECG signals. To evaluate how accurately and precisely the developed classifier systems detect MS from ECG signals, we use the following procedures. Initially, we use algorithms that automatically extract Q, R, and S peaks from ECG waveforms. Subsequently, we extract temporal features mainly associated with averages and variances of intervals and ratios between successive Q, R, and S peaks. We also use features describing the cardiac axis. The features are then used for training and testing classifier systems, including Support Vector Machines (SVMs) and RobustBoost classifiers. We also test the use of classifiers operating on raw ECG signals, without preliminary explicit feature extraction. The tested models constitute different configurations of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). Our results indicate that it is possible to classify ECG signals in two different classes, separating people with MS from a control group, with statistically significant results. SVM, RobustBoost, and CNN models obtained average accuracy values equal to 94%, 89%, and 98%, respectively. These results indicate that automatic computer-aided diagnositcs of MS can be added to standard ECG clinical exams.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.