ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Using the EMFIT Sensor in Geophysical Monitoring.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
EMFIT, also referred to as EMFi, is a ferroelectret film related to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) sensors. It is an electroactive polymer (EAP) based on a polyolefin structure and consists of three layers of polyester film. Its application in geophysical monitoring has not been reported in the literature. At present, EMFIT is mainly employed in ballistocardiography and medical sleep monitoring, as developed by the manufacturer Emfit Ltd. (Vaajakoski, Finland). Within the multidisciplinary monitoring network of the National Institute for Earth Physics (NIEP), EMFIT is used as a pressure sensor in combination with infrasound transducers and microphones deployed in seismic areas. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate its suitability for detecting seismic noise that precedes earthquakes, generated by rock fracturing associated with crustal deformation. Although similar studies have been reported, they have not involved the use of EMFIT sensors. The novelty of this approach lies in the large surface area and mechanical flexibility of the material. Beyond seismic forecasting, the research also examines whether this type of sensor can contribute to seismic monitoring as a complement to conventional instruments such as accelerometers, seismometers, and microbarometers. Data analysis relies primarily on spectral time-series methods and incorporates measurements from other acoustic sensors (microphones and microbarometers) as well as a weather station. The working hypothesis is the potential correlation between the recorded data and the presence of enhanced noise prior to the detection of seismic waves by standard seismic sensors. The target area for this investigation is Vrancea, specifically the Vrâncioaia seismic station, where multidisciplinary monitoring includes infrasound, radon, thoron, soil temperature, and atmospheric electrical discharges. Preliminary tests suggest that the EMFIT sensor may function as a highly sensitive device, effectively serving as an "ear" for detecting ground noise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.