ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Automated Control of Rehabilitation Process in Physical Therapy Using a Novel Human Skeleton-Based Balanced Time Warping Algorithm.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Perception, assessment, and coaching: a systematic review and taxonomy of computer vision-based physical rehabilitation techniques.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Advanced Sensors for Real-Time Monitoring Applications ‖.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Automated Control of Rehabilitation Process in Physical Therapy Using a Novel Human Skeleton-Based Balanced Time Warping Algorithm.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Physical therapy is a critical component of medical rehabilitation, aiding recovery from conditions such as stroke, spinal cord injuries, and musculoskeletal disorders. Effective rehabilitation requires precise monitoring of patient performance to ensure exercises are executed correctly and progress is accurately assessed. This paper presents a novel automated system for controlling the rehabilitation process and evaluating physical therapy exercise quality using computer vision and a customized Human Skeleton-based Balanced Time Warping algorithm. The proposed method quantitatively assesses the similarity between a physiotherapist and patient performance by analyzing skeletal motion data extracted from RGB-D video sequences without requiring pre-alignment or sensor-specific calibration. A motion-dependent, weighted Euclidean distance between 3D skeletal models is used to compute pose dissimilarity, while a modified DTW approach aligns temporal sequences and evaluates dynamic consistency. The total dissimilarity measure is a balanced combination of posture (DP) and dynamics (DT) components. Evaluated on a custom dataset of 136 video recordings from 23 participants performing exercises in sitting and standing positions under varying performance accuracy levels ("good," "intermediate," and "bad"), the system demonstrates the strong clustering of accuracy levels. Proposed dissimilarity, together with a fixed reference element (physiotherapist), induces a natural non-strict order on the set of distances between patients and physiotherapists. A high value of Spearman's rank correlation coefficient between computed dissimilarity and execution accuracy (0.977) indicates that this method is suitable for assessing exercise performance accuracy and for adequately evaluating the patient's rehabilitation progress. The method enables objective, real-time feedback, reduces therapist workload, and supports remote monitoring, offering a scalable solution for personalized rehabilitation. Future work will involve clinical validation with post-stroke and cardiac patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.