ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Assessing User Experience with Piezoresistive Force Sensors: Interpreting Button Press Impulse and Duration.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As robotic systems become increasingly integrated into daily life, the need for user experience (UX) assessment methods that are both privacy-conscious and suitable for embedded hardware platforms has grown. Traditional UX evaluations relying on vision, audio, or lengthy questionnaires are often intrusive, computationally demanding, or impractical for low-power devices. In this study, we introduce a novel sensor-based method for assessing UX through direct physical interaction. We designed a robot lamp with a force-sensing button interface and conducted a user study involving controlled robot errors. Participants interacted with the lamp during a reading task and rated their UX on a 7-point Likert scale. Using force and time data from button presses, we correlated force and time data to user experience and demographic information. Our results demonstrate the potential of bodily interaction metrics as a viable alternative for UX assessment in human-robot interaction, enabling real-time, embedded, and privacy-aware evaluation of user satisfaction in robotic systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.