ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Scheme for System Error Calibration and Compensation of the Initial State of MEMS Inertial Navigation.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aiming at the challenge of balancing the accuracy and cost of the initial state calibration of traditional MEMS inertial navigation systems, as well as the current situation of the lack of high-precision three-axis turntables in engineering practice, this paper proposes a practical and innovative systematic error calibration and compensation scheme, which effectively suppresses the deterministic errors of MEMS-INS and enhances its applicability in high-precision and long-duration tasks. By analyzing the coordinate transformation characteristics of the MEMS-INS solution process under small-angle disturbances, a deterministic error model based on the device's zero bias, scale factor, and cross-coupling errors is constructed. A twelve-position dual-axis calibration method, combined with a high-precision orthogonal fixture, is designed to excite errors on a dual-axis turntable, converting originally unobservable error terms into observable periodic signals. Experimental results show that the installation error calibration accuracy reaches 0.03°, an improvement of about 25% compared to the traditional dual-axis method, breaking through the limitations of dual-axis turntables in cross-coupling error calibration, achieving an initial error ≤ 1 μrad, and reducing the navigation error by 90% within one hour. This method eliminates reliance on expensive three-axis turntables while enabling multi-error calibration, addressing the cost-accuracy trade-off in engineering applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.