ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
InertialMov: Machine Learning Test Based on Inertial Sensors to Predict Mobility Impairment in Low Back Pain Patients.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Low back pain (LBP) is one of the leading causes of disability in the world's population, yet there are limitations in providing an objective clinical assessment due to its widespread nature. In this work, five machine learning models (LightGBM, XGBoost, HistGradientBoosting, GradientBoosting, and StackingRegressor) were compared to predict trunk mobility based on inertial sensor data. There were 77 individuals with a total of 2160 movement samples of flexion-extension, rotation, and lateralization. Synthetic data augmentation and normalization were performed to be able to work with the data efficiently. Mean absolute error (MAE), mean square error (MSE), and R2 were used to evaluate model performance. Additionally, ANOVA and Tukey's HSD were used to assess the statistical significance of the models. GradientBoostingRegressor was found to produce the lowest error and statistical significance in flexion-extension and lateralization, while StackingRegressor produced the best error in rotation. The results indicate that inertial sensors and machine learning (ML) can be applied to predict mobility, facilitating personalized rehabilitation and reducing costs. The present study demonstrates that predictive trunk motion modeling can facilitate clinical monitoring and help reduce socioeconomic limitations in patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.