ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Use of Accelerometers to Monitor Motor Activity During HABIT-ILE for Chronic Stroke: An Exploratory Study.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Digital biomarkers derived from wearable sensors in neurorehabilitation: a scoping review.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
(1) Background: Hand and Arm Bimanual Intensive Therapy Including Lower Extremities (HABIT-ILE) is a high-dose evidence-based neurorehabilitation. This study aims to develop and validate a protocol using three inertial measurement units (IMUs) to objectively document upper and lower extremities' (UE; LE) motor activity during a HABIT-ILE intervention in chronic stroke adults. (2) Method: Thirteen adults (57.1 y ± 11.3) who completed 65 h of HABIT-ILE (2 weeks, 6.5 h/d) were included. Daily motor activity was recorded with IMUs placed on both wrists and one thigh with nine IMU-derived variables extracted to evaluate motor activity and posture. Each variable was correlated with baseline abilities and day-to-day patterns were observed with subgroup analyses based on baseline dexterity and walking endurance. Day-to-day patterns were highlighted based on mean values and effect size analyses. (3) Results: Only the Magnitude and Use ratios showed high correlations with baseline abilities, with a day-to-day specific pattern highlighted for participants with moderate to good dexterity at baseline. (4) Conclusions: All participants reported a high level of engagement during HABIT-ILE independently of their baseline abilities. Although we could not detect a global trend to document the content of a HABIT-ILE intervention, these exploratory results suggest IMU monitoring to be relevant to characterize therapeutic content.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.