ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Mechanical Analysis for Active Movement of Upper Limb Rehabilitation Robots to Alleviate Shoulder Pain in Patients with Stroke Hemiplegia and Frozen Shoulder.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Shoulder disorders, including frozen shoulder resulting from stroke-induced hemiplegia, significantly reduce a patient's ability to perform activities of daily living, thereby necessitating repeated rehabilitation. Consequently, extensive research has been conducted on rehabilitation robots to assist in upper-limb motor recovery. The shoulder moves according to the scapulohumeral rhythm. Considering the biomechanical characteristics of the shoulder joint, the rehabilitation robot was designed to replicate a similar kinematic environment using actuators and linkages that emulate the structures of the upper arm, shoulder, and clavicle. To ensure precise operation, the kinematic accuracy of the robot was pre-evaluated. Kinematic analyses were conducted using MATLAB, and the results were compared with coordinate data from the mechanical design to evaluate positional accuracy. In addition, the convergence and accuracy of joint-angle estimation for target positions were analyzed. The forward kinematic analysis revealed that the average positional error between the measured and target coordinates ranged from 0.5% to 2.8%, with the Base Motor-Back Motor segment exhibiting the highest error (2.8%). The inverse kinematic analysis demonstrated stable convergence to the target positions through iterative computations using the Gauss-Newton method, confirming that the actual motion could be accurately reproduced within the designed range of motion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.