ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Advanced Signal Analysis Model for Internal Defect Mapping in Bridge Decks Using Impact-Echo Field Testing.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents an advanced signal analysis model for internal defect identification in bridge decks using impact echo field testing data designed to mitigate signal noise and the variability encountered during real-world inspections. Field tests were conducted on a concrete bridge deck utilizing an automated inspection system, systematically capturing impact-echo signals across multiple scanning paths. The large volume of field-acquired data poses significant challenges, particularly in identifying defects and isolating clean signals and suppressing noise under variable environmental conditions. To enhance the accuracy of defect detection, a deep learning framework was designed to refine critical signal parameters, such as signal duration and the starting point in relation to the zero-crossing. A convolutional neural network (CNN)-based classification model was developed to categorize signals into delamination, non-delamination, and insignificant classes. Through systematic parameter tuning, optimal values of 1 ms signal duration and 0.1 ms starting time were identified, resulting in a classification accuracy of 88.8%. Laboratory test results were used to validate the signal behavior trends observed during the parameter optimization process. Comparison of defect maps generated before and after applying the CNN-optimized signal parameters revealed significant enhancements in detection accuracy. The findings highlight the effectiveness of integrating advanced signal analysis and deep learning techniques with impact-echo testing, offering a robust non-destructive evaluation approach for large-scaled infrastructures such as bridge deck condition assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.