ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Blockchain-Integrated Secure Authentication Framework for Smart Grid IoT Using Energy-Aware Consensus Mechanisms.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Blockchain-Backed Revocation and Yang-Baxter Consistency Screening for Zero-Trust IoT Admission Control.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Sensor-Based Cyber Risk Management in Railway Infrastructure Under the NIS2 Directive.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Integrating IoT devices into smart grids raises some hard problems related to safe data sharing, the ability to grow, and energy use. Blockchain provides a safe way to check identities without a central authority. Typical ways to confirm transactions, like Proof-of-Work (PoW), use a lot of power, making them bad for devices that cannot use much energy. This study introduces a safe authentication system using Blockchain, a Deep Neural Network (DNN), and a power-saving way to confirm transactions (EACM). The system picks validators based on how much power they have left and their trust scores to save power during confirmation. Using the IoT-Enabled Smart Grid Dataset, simulations showed a transaction speed of 372 TPS, which is 32% better than normal methods. The system correctly authenticates 98.69% of the time, with a confirmation delay of 5.9 milliseconds and an 18% drop in validator node energy use. Also, the system spots 98.4% of unauthorized access tries, with a false acceptance rate (FAR) of 1.7% and a false rejection rate (FRR) of 0.31%. These outcomes prove the system's ability to offer safe, fast, and energy-saving authentication for big, real-time Smart Grid IoT setups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.