ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Autonomous Hazardous Gas Detection Systems: A Systematic Review.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gas Detection Systems (GDSs) are critical safety technologies deployed in semiconductor wafer fabrication facilities to monitor the presence of hazardous gases. A GDS receives input from gas detectors equipped with consumable gas sensors, such as electrochemical (EC) and metal oxide semiconductor (MOS) types, which are used to detect toxic, flammable, or reactive gases. However, over time, sensors degradations, accuracy drift, and cross-sensitivity to interference gases compromise their intended performance. To maintain sensor accuracy and reliability, routine manual calibration is required-an approach that is resource-intensive, time-consuming, and prone to human error, especially in facilities with extensive networks of gas detectors. This systematic review (PROSPERO on 11th October 2025 Registration number: 1166004) explored minimizing or eliminating the dependency on manual calibration. Findings indicate that using properly calibrated gas sensor data can support advanced data analytics and machine learning algorithms to correct accuracy drift and improve gas selectivity. Techniques such as Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Support Vector Machines (SVMs), multivariate regression, and calibration transfer have been effectively applied to differentiate target gases from interferences and compensate for sensor aging and environmental variability. The paper also explores the emerging potential for integrating calibration-free or self-correcting gas sensor systems into existing GDS infrastructures. Despite significant progress, key research challenges persist. These include understanding the dynamics of sensor response drift due to prolonged gas exposure, synchronizing multi-sensor data collection to minimize time-related drift, and aligning ambient sensor signals with gas analytical references. Future research should prioritize the development of application-specific datasets, adaptive environmental compensation models, and hybrid validation frameworks. These advancements will contribute to the realization of intelligent, autonomous, and data-driven gas detection solutions that are robust, scalable, and well-suited to the operational complexities of modern industrial environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.