ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Robust and Efficient Workflow for Heart Valve Disease Detection from PCG Signals: Integrating WCNN, MFCC Optimization, and Signal Quality Evaluation.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study proposes a comprehensive and computationally efficient system for the recognition of heart valve diseases (HVDs) in phonocardiogram (PCG) signals, emphasizing an end-to-end workflow suitable for real-world deployment. The core of the system is a lightweight weighted convolutional neural network (WCNN) featuring a key weighting calculation (KWC) layer, which enhances noise robustness by adaptively weighting feature map channels based on global average pooling. The proposed system incorporates optimized feature extraction using Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs) guided by GradCAM, and a band energy ratio (BER) metric to assess signal quality, showing that lower BER values are associated with higher misclassification rates due to noise. Experimental results demonstrated classification accuracies of 99.6% and 90.74% on the GitHub PCG and PhysioNet/CinC Challenge 2016 databases, respectively, where the models were trained and tested independently. The proposed model achieved superior accuracy using significantly fewer parameters (312,357) and lower computational cost (4.5 M FLOPs) compared with previously published research. Compared with the model proposed by Karhade et al., the proposed model use 74.9% fewer parameters and 99.3% fewer FLOPs. Furthermore, the proposed model was implemented on a Raspberry Pi, achieving real-time HVDs detection with a detection time of only 1.87 ms for a 1.4 s signal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.