ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Machine Learning-Based Image Reconstruction in Wearable CC-EIT of the Thorax: Robustness to Electrode Displacement.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in Wearable Bioimaging.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates the influence of variable electrode positions on image reconstruction in capacitively coupled electrical impedance tomography (CC-EIT) of the human thorax. Images were reconstructed by an adversarial neural network trained on a synthetic dataset generated using a tomographic model that included a wearable elastic band with 32 electrodes attached. Dataset generation was conducted using a previously developed numerical phantom of the thorax, combined with a newly developed algorithm for random selection of electrode positions based on physical limitations resulting from the elasticity of the band and possible position inaccuracies while putting the band on the patient's chest. The thorax phantom included the heart, lungs, aorta, and spine. Four training and four testing datasets were generated using four different levels of electrode displacement. Reconstruction was conducted using four versions of neural networks trained on the datasets, with random ellipses included and noise added to achieve an SNR of 30 dB. The quality was assessed using pixel-to-pixel metrics such as the root-mean-square error, structural similarity index, 2D correlation coefficient, and peak signal-to-noise ratio. The results showed a strong negative influence of electrode displacement on reconstruction quality when no samples with displaced electrodes were present in the training dataset. Training the network on the dataset containing samples with electrode displacement allowed us to significantly improve the quality of the reconstructed images. Introducing samples with misplaced electrodes increased neural network robustness to electrode displacement while testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.