Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41228746›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Predicting Extreme Environmental Values with Hybrid Models: A Perspective Across Air Quality, Wind Energy, and Sensor Networks.

George Efthimiou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

George EfthimiouFLUENC, 55535 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-6088-8297

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This Perspective synthesizes recent (2023-2025) progress in predicting extreme environmental values by combining empirical formulations, physics-based simulation outputs, and sensor-network data. We argue that hybrid approaches-spanning physics-informed machine learning, digital/operational twins, and edge/embedded AI-can deliver faster and more robust maxima estimates than standalone CFD or purely data-driven models, particularly for urban air quality and wind-energy applications. We distill lessons from cross-domain case studies and highlight five open challenges (uncertainty quantification, reproducibility and benchmarks, sensor layout optimization, real-time inference at the edge, and trustworthy model governance). Building on these, we propose a 2025-2030 research agenda: (i) standardized, open benchmarks with sensor-CFD pairs; (ii) physics-informed learners for extremes; (iii) adaptive source-term estimation pipelines; (iv) lightweight inference for embedded sensing; (v) interoperable digital-twin workflows; and (vi) reporting standards for uncertainty and ethics. The goal is a pragmatic path that couples scientific validity with deployability in operational environments. This Perspective is intended for researchers and practitioners in environmental sensing, urban dispersion, and renewable energy who seek actionable, cross-disciplinary directions for the next wave of extreme-value prediction. For instance, in validation studies using CFD-RANS and sensor data, the proposed hybrid models achieved prediction accuracies for peak pollutant concentrations and wind speeds within ~90-95% of high-fidelity simulations, with a computational cost reduction of over 80%. These results underscore the practical viability of the approach for operational use cases such as urban air quality alerts and wind farm micro-siting.

Indexed as

air quality monitoringenvironmental sensor networksextreme value predictionhybrid modelingwind energy optimization

Identifiers

PMID41228746
PMCPMC12609135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.