ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Camera-Based Monocular Depth Estimation in Orthodontics: Vision Transformer vs. CNN Model Performance.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMonocular Depth Estimation (MDE) is a computer vision approach that predicts spatial depth information from a single two-dimensional image. In orthodontics, where facial soft-tissue evaluation is integral to diagnosis and treatment planning, such methods offer new possibilities for obtaining sagittal profile information from standard frontal photographs. This study aimed to determine whether MDE can extract clinically meaningful information for facial profile assessment.
methodsStandardized frontal photographs and lateral cephalometric radiographs from 82 adult patients (48 Class I, 28 Class II, 6 Class III) were retrospectively analyzed. Three clinically relevant soft-tissue landmarks-Upper Lip Anterior (ULA), Lower Lip Anterior (LLA), and Soft Tissue Pogonion (Pog')-were annotated on frontal photographs, while true vertical line (TVL) analysis from cephalograms served as the reference standard. For each case, anteroposterior (AP) relationships among the three landmarks were represented as ordinal rankings based on predicted depth values, and accuracy was defined as complete agreement between model-derived and reference rankings. Depth maps were generated using one vision transformer model (DPT-Large) and two CNN-based models (DepthAnything-v2 and ZoeDepth). Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, 95% confidence intervals, and effect size measures.
resultsThe transformer-based DPT-Large achieved clinically acceptable accuracy in 92.7% of cases (76/82; 95% CI: 84.8-97.3), significantly outperforming the CNN-based models DepthAnything-v2 (9.8%) and ZoeDepth (4.9%), both of which performed below the theoretical chance level (16.7%).
conclusionsVision transformer-based Monocular Depth Estimation demonstrates the potential for clinically meaningful soft-tissue profiling from frontal photographs, suggesting that depth information derived from two-dimensional images may serve as a supportive tool for facial profile evaluation. These findings provide a foundation for future studies exploring the integration of depth-based analysis into digital orthodontic diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.