ArticlePolymers2025
Green Synthesis of Chitosan Silver Nanoparticle Composite Materials: A Comparative Study of Microwave and One-Pot Reduction Methods.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Nano-Silver Fluoride Containing 2000 ppm Silver Nanoparticles on the Microhardness and Color of Flowable Resin Composites: An In Vitro Pilot Study.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Formulation-Dependent Antimicrobial Activity and Plant Compatibility of Chitosan-Based Silver Nanoparticles.Marine drugs · 2026Article
- Eco-friendly silver nanoparticles from neem extracts: a dual approach to heavy metal sensing and antimicrobial applications.Bioresources and bioprocessing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Green synthesis methods of silver nanoparticles have gained great attention because they offer sustainable, eco-friendly, and less-toxic alternatives to traditional methods. This study sheds light on the green synthesis of chitosan silver nanoparticle composites, providing a comparative evaluation of microwave-assisted (M1) and a one-pot (M2) reduction methods. The morphological, crystallinity, and structural uniformity characteristics were evaluated by UV-Visible, Raman spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with employing image processing pipeline based on deep learning model for segmentation and particles size estimation. The UV-visible spectrum exhibited independent SPR peaks ranging from 400 to 450 nm for all samples; however, microwave assisted-synthesis possessed narrower and more intense peaks indicative of better crystallinity and mono-dispersity. SEM depicted smaller, more uniformly dispersed particles for microwave-assisted (M1), while deep learning segmentation showed lower particle size variability (σ ≈ 24-43 nm), compared to polydisperse (σ ≈ 16-59 nm) in M2 samples. XRD showed crystalline face-centered cubic (FCC) silver with dominant peaks in M1 samples, whereas M2 had broader, less intense peaks with amorphous features. Raman vibrations revealed more structural order and homogenous capping in M1 than M2. Therefore, microwave-assisted (M1) showed better control on nucleation, particle size, crystallinity, and homogeneity due to a faster and uniform energy distribution. The future research would focus on the antimicrobial evaluation of such nanoparticles in agronomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.