ArticlePolymers2025
Internal Induction Heating for Local Heating in Injection Molding.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study introduces Internal Induction Heating (In-IH) as an efficient method for local mold temperature control in thin-walled polypropylene (PP) injection molding. Unlike conventional systems that are slow and energy-intensive, the insert is integrated directly into the induction circuit in the In-IH system, generating eddy currents for rapid and localized heating. Numerical and experimental analyses were performed to examine the effects of insert geometry and heating parameters; it was found that thinner inserts achieved higher surface temperatures-the 0.5 mm insert reached ~550 °C, while the 2.0 mm insert reached only ~80 °C-confirming an inverse relationship between thickness and temperature. Narrower inserts (25 mm) concentrated heat more effectively, whereas wider ones yielded better temperature uniformity. The cooling conditions strongly affected the temperature gradients. Mold-filling experiments demonstrated that In-IH significantly improved the flowability of PP: at 180 °C, the 0.4 mm specimen achieved a flow length of 85.33 mm, compared with 43.66 mm for the 0.2 mm specimen. At 250-300 °C, all samples approached full filling (~100 mm). The simulation and experimental results agreed, with a maximum deviation of 10%, confirming that In-IH provides rapid, energy-efficient, and precise temperature control, thus enhancing melt flow and product quality for thin-walled PP components.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.