Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41228652›Full record

ArticlePolymers2025

Influence of Draft Angle Design on Surface Texture-Dimensional Accuracy Coupling in Injection-Molded Commodity and Engineering Polymers with Semi-Crystalline and Amorphous Characteristics.

Hui-Li Chen, Po-Wei Huang, Yu-Shan Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hui-Li ChenMechanical Engineering, College of Semiconductor Engineering, CTBC University of Technology, Tainan 74448, Taiwan.
Po-Wei HuangMechanical and Automation Engineering, College of Engineering, Taiwan Steel University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 821013, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-5681-2305
Yu-Shan HuangPlastic Precision Machining Center, College of Semiconductor Engineering, CTBC University of Technology, Tainan 74448, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In injection molding, draft angle design plays a critical role in ensuring smooth de-molding and maintaining surface quality. With the growing emphasis on aesthetics and the increasing demand for the appearance of plastic products, the need for textured plastic components has continuously risen. The coupling between surface texture replication and dimensional accuracy has become an important indicator of product performance. However, systematic studies on the interaction between different polymer materials and draft angle design remain limited. This study aims to investigate the influence of draft angle variation on the surface texture quality and dimensional stability of injection-molded parts by comparing the differences between crystalline and amorphous thermoplastic materials, as well as between commodity and engineering plastics. Four representative polymers, namely polypropylene (PP), polyoxymethylene (POM), acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS), and polycarbonate (PC), were selected to examine the impact of material characteristics on surface texture replication after molding. In addition, product geometries incorporating eight draft angles (0° to 3.5°) were designed. Surface texture replication was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and surface profilometry, while dimensional deformation was measured with a high-precision optical measuring instrument. The results show that draft angle variation has a limited influence on the overall trend of dimensional deformation, but it has a significant effect on the clarity of surface replication. Crystalline polymers exhibited generally higher surface roughness than amorphous polymers, and the distinction between commodity and engineering plastics, particularly those requiring higher processing temperatures, also led to higher roughness (PP > POM; ABS > PC). Dimensional deformation was more pronounced in crystalline polymers (POM > PP > ABS > PC). SEM observations further confirmed that higher roughness corresponded to clearer and more distinguishable texture patterns, whereas lower roughness resulted in blurred or indistinct textures.

Indexed as

crystalline and amorphous polymersdimensional accuracydraft angle designplastics injection moldingsurface texture replication

Identifiers

PMID41228652
PMCPMC12610838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.