UiO-66-(COOH)

Guifang Yang, Qiu Wu, Gao Xiao, Xiaoxia Ye

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Guifang YangFujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Ecological Impacts and Treatment Technologies for Emerging Contaminants, College of Environmental and Biological Engineering, Putian University, Putian 351100, China.ORCID 0009-0007-9919-1474

Qiu WuCollege of Environment and Safety Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China.

Gao XiaoCollege of Environment and Safety Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China.

Xiaoxia YeCollege of Environment and Safety Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Membrane separation is a promising technology for emulsified wastewater treatment. However, conventional membrane often suffer from limitations such as low mechanical strength, the inherent "trade-off" effect between flux and separation efficiency, and poor antifouling properties. To address these challenges, we report a novel composite membrane (CFM-UiO-66-(COOH)

Indexed as

cationic emulsion demulsificationcharge neutralizationcollagen fiber membranesize exclusionsurfactant

Identifiers

PMID41228640

DOI10.3390/polym17212879

PMCPMC12608758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.