Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41228588›Full record

ReviewPolymers2025

Towards Fire-Safe Polymer Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion Batteries: Strategies for Electrolyte Design and Structural Design.

Khang Le Truong, Joonho Bae

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Recent advances in TiNanoscale advances · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Khang Le TruongDepartment of Physics and Semiconductor Science, Gachon University, Seongnam-si 13120, Republic of Korea.
Joonho BaeDepartment of Physics and Semiconductor Science, Gachon University, Seongnam-si 13120, Republic of Korea.

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2021R1A2C 1008272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lithium-ion batteries, widely used in phones and electric vehicles, pose safety concerns due to the flammability of conventional liquid electrolytes, which are prone to ignition under elevated temperatures and mechanical stress, increasing the risk of fire. Polymer electrolytes have been employed as a safer solution thanks to their superior thermal stability and mechanical strength. However, despite these advantages, many polymer matrices pose a fire hazard, limiting their potential. This review assesses recent advances in enhancing the flame retardancy of polymer electrolytes through a variety of strategies, namely the incorporation of flame-retardant additives, the addition of nanoscale fillers to improve thermal resistance, and the design of layered or hybrid polymer membrane structures that function as thermal barriers. This review evaluates the effectiveness of these methods, examining their flame-retardancy as well as their influences on ionic conductivity and overall battery performance. By highlighting recent progress and enduring safety challenges in solid-state batteries, it aims to offer insights for developing lithium batteries with enhanced safety and high performance.

Indexed as

flame retardantlithium-ion batteriespolymer electrolytes

Identifiers

PMID41228588
PMCPMC12610152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.