ArticlePolymers2025
Evaluation of Rheological Properties of Warm Mix Flame-Retardant Asphalt (WMFRA) Binder Suitable for Tunnel Area.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to systematically evaluate the rheological properties of warm mix flame-retardant asphalt (WMFRA). First, conventional performance tests were conducted on the prepared warm mix rubberized asphalt (WMRA), incorporating different warm mix agents in order to screen out an agent with optimum performance. Subsequently, limestone power (LP), aluminum trihydrate (ATH), OA composed of ATH and organically modified montmorillonite (OMMT), and zinc borate (ZK) were employed in the oxygen index (OI) test of WMFRA to determine the optimal dosage of flame retardants. Finally, a dynamic shear rheometer (DSR) and a bending beam rheometer (BBR) were used to evaluate the rheological properties of WMFRA. The results showed that the R-Type warm mix agent was superior to S-Type in reducing consistency and improving low-temperature cracking resistance but slightly weakened high-temperature stability. The OA composite flame retardant could enhance the OI from 20.16% to 24% at 15wt% dosage, thereby meeting the specified flame-retardant requirement. Furthermore, OA could markedly boost the high-temperature performance of WMFRA, exhibiting significantly higher complex modulus (G*) and rutting factor (G*/sinδ) compared to WMFRA with other flame retardants. In general, all flame retardants reduced the temperature sensitivity of WMFRA, with ZK being the most effective at 12.6%. Regarding low-temperature performance, LP and ATH improved stress relaxation of WMFRA, while ZK and OA impaired this capability. All flame retardants reduced low-temperature flexibility, but the low-temperature behavior was still dominated by the S(t). For fatigue performance, LP and ATH degraded the fatigue performance by advancing the damage time by 958.9 s and 669.7 s, respectively. In contrast, ZK improved fatigue performance by increasing the complex shear modulus, thereby extending the fatigue life (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.