Influence of Fabric Support on Improving the Layer-by-Layer Polyethersulfone Membrane Performance.

Ahmed A Bhran, Abdelrahman G Gadallah, Eman S Mansor, Heba Abdallah

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ahmed A BhranChemical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 11432, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-9027-3453

Abdelrahman G GadallahChemical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 11432, Saudi Arabia.

Eman S MansorWater Pollution Research Department, Environment and Climate Change Research Institute, National Research Centre, Giza 12622, Egypt.

Heba AbdallahChemical Engineering & Pilot Plant Department, Engineering Research Institute, New and Renewable Energy, National Research Centre, Giza 12622, Egypt.

Funding

Imam Mohammad ibn Saud Islamic University IMSIU-DDRSP2502

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work is based on studying the effect of different kinds of support on the prepared reverse osmosis membranes. Different kinds of woven and non-woven supports were tested and characterized to select the best one for RO membrane preparation. The prepared membrane on polyester woven support (M1ws) provides 39.9 LMH permeate flux using a piperazine coagulation bath during membrane preparation, while polyester non-woven support (M2ns) exhibits the highest salt rejection percentage, which was 92.2% using a Melamine coagulation bath. The mechanical properties for preparing membranes using supports were arranged in descending order as follows: M1ws > M2ns > M3np. The membrane on polypropylene support (M3np) provides the lowest mechanical properties.

Indexed as

fabric supportmembranenon-wovenpolyesterpolypropylenewoven

Identifiers

PMID41228584

DOI10.3390/polym17212825

PMCPMC12609775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.