ArticlePolymers2025
The Role of Cross-Sectional Design and Orientation in Governing Energy Absorption of Additively Manufactured Polyamide 12 (PA12) Octet Lattices.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the influence of strut cross-sectional geometry and orientation on the crashworthiness of octet truss lattice structures produced via Multi Jet Fusion (MJF) using Polyamide 12 (PA12) material. All lattice configurations were designed and printed at a constant relative density of approximately 30%, ensuring equal mass and material usage across geometries. Quasi-static compression tests were conducted on lattices featuring circular, elliptical, rectangular, and square struts, with the latter two also evaluated at 0° and 90° orientations relative to the loading direction. Energy absorption (EA), specific energy absorption (SEA), crush force efficiency (CFE), and mean plateau stress metrics were employed to evaluate the structural energy absorption efficiency. The results highlight that strut geometry and orientation significantly alter mechanical behavior due to differences in moments of inertia. The circular strut lattice, used as the reference configuration, achieved an SEA of 0.79 J/g. Among the tested designs, the elliptical lattice exhibited the most pronounced variation: the non-rotated version showed the lowest SEA (0.63 J/g, ~20% lower than the reference), whereas the 90° rotated version yielded the highest SEA (0.92 J/g, ~16% higher). Rectangular struts displayed a similar trend, with rotated specimens outperforming their non-rotated counterparts. Square struts, however, showed negligible differences between orientations, as their rotational inertia remained constant. Overall, the findings demonstrate that optimizing strut cross-sections can enhance crashworthiness by improving energy dissipation and stabilizing deformation mechanisms under compressive loading. The rotated elliptical cross-section emerged as the most efficient configuration, offering superior SEA and crush stress efficiency. The findings highlight that cross-sectional design and orientation provide an effective mechanism for tuning mechanical performance in lightweight lattice materials without altering overall density or topology. These insights emphasize the potential of geometric tailoring in lattice design to meet safety and lightweight requirements in transportation, defense and biomedical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.