ReviewNutrients2025
The Role of Vitamins in Sepsis: A Narrative Review.
Review in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integration of Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index and Lactate for diagnostic and early risk stratification in pediatric sepsis.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Intravenous Vitamin C in Severe Sepsis: A Systematic Review of Evidence From 2020 to 2025.Cureus · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis remains one of the major challenges in modern intensive care, characterized by high mortality and complex metabolic and immunological disturbances. Given the limited effectiveness of current therapeutic strategies, increasing attention has been directed toward supportive interventions aimed at restoring metabolic homeostasis. Particular interest has been focused on selected vitamins that exhibit pleiotropic biological effects. Thus, we summarized the current evidence on the role of selected vitamins (C, D, B1, B9, B12) in the treatment and supportive management of sepsis, highlighting their mechanisms of action, potential clinical benefits, and limitations derived from available studies. A comprehensive analysis of the literature was performed, including clinical trials and meta-analyses evaluating the efficacy of vitamin supplementation in sepsis, with particular emphasis on combined interventions and randomized controlled trials in severe sepsis and septic shock. Vitamin D might demonstrate the greatest therapeutic potential, particularly in patients with severe sepsis and respiratory failure, with benefits associated with achieving appropriate therapeutic concentrations. Thiamine (vitamin B1) appears to provide potential advantages primarily in deficient patients, improving mitochondrial function and reducing the risk of renal failure. Evidence regarding folic acid (vitamin B9) and cobalamin (vitamin B12) remains inconclusive, as both deficiency and elevated serum levels have been linked to adverse outcomes. Vitamin C, despite its well-documented antioxidant and microcirculatory effects, has not yet shown consistent evidence of mortality reduction. In conclusion, current evidence suggests that vitamin supplementation might represent an adjunct to standard sepsis therapy, particularly within a personalized approach that considers nutritional status and metabolic phenotype. The development of standardized dosing protocols and well-designed clinical trials is essential to determine the efficacy and safety of phenotype-driven individualized approaches in sepsis management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.