ArticleCancers2025
Retrospective Trial on Cetuximab Plus Radiotherapy in Elderly Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer.
Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA wide percentage (25-40%) of patients affected by head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are over 70 years old, and they present with different characteristics if compared to younger patients. Elderly patients often receive less intensive, non-surgical, and non-multimodal treatments. Although age does not mean frailty, the elderly are at a higher risk of developing toxicity. In fact, several studies enrolling patients treated with cisplatin + radiotherapy (CISPLATIN + RT) or cetuximab + radiotherapy (Cet + RT) showed reduced efficacy over 65 years.
methodsWe conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis in patients with Locally Advanced HNSCC aged over 65 years, who underwent Cet-RT, diagnosed in the period between 2017 and 2024. The primary endpoint was to describe Overall Survival (OS), the secondary endpoints were Progression Free Survival (PFS) and the percentage and type of Adverse Events (AEs). Patients received a geriatric assessment using the G8 questionnaire.
resultsData regarding Eighty-Two (82) patients were analyzed, median age was 74 years (range 65-84), most patients had oral cavity (26.8%) and laryngeal cancer (37.8%). Fifty-six point one (56.1%) of patients were smokers, and 17.1% reported alcohol consumption. All patients completed radiotherapy, and 80.5% of them developed AEs, which in 25.6% of cases were G3-4 toxicities. No relationship was found between G3-4 AEs and age (
conclusionsIn elderly patients, Cet-RT represents a feasible, well-tolerated option, although further prospective studies are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.