ReviewCancers2025
Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Immunocompromised Patients.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic Factors of Locally Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Head and Neck Region in Transplanted Patients.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Special Issue on Skin Cancers of the Head and Neck.Cancers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is the second most common skin malignancy in the world, representing approximately 20% of all skin cancers. Immunosuppression is a well-established risk factor, contributing not only to the development of new cSCC lesions but also to more aggressive disease and increased mortality. Despite the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition updates recognizing immunosuppression as a risk factor for cSCC, standardized management protocols for these high-risk patients remain limited. As a result, treatment of this already high-risk group remains a significant challenge and highlights the need for dedicated research and attention to improve outcomes in this patient population. This review explores the current knowledge regarding cSCC in IS patients, outlines key gaps in the knowledge, and highlights recent clinical trials to further guide the evaluation and management of these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.