ReviewCancers2025
Potential of Proteases in the Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Matrix Metalloproteinases and Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines in Bladder Cancer: Diagnostic and Prognostic Perspectives: Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Navigating the molecular landscape: integrated multiomics liquid biopsy for biomarker discovery in early detection and monitoring of colorectal cancer.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bladder carcinoma (BC) is evaluated as the ninth most common cancer worldwide and the sixth most common cancer among men. The determination of the occurrence and stage of the disease is a significant diagnostic task. An alternative to an invasive biopsy may be the determination of biomarkers in patient samples such as bladder tissue, blood serum, plasma, or urine samples. The aim of this paper is to review reports on the role of proteases in bladder cancer and their determination in cancerous samples. Proteases can be classified in several groups depending on their catalytic residue, most commonly aspartic, cysteine, serine, metalloproteinases, and others. A review was made of papers reporting cysteine cathepsins: B, L, H, V, S, aspartyl cathepsin D, and metalloproteinases MMP 1, 2, 3, 7, 9, 10, 14, and 15, as well as ubiquitin-specific proteases USP 1, 2a and 5. The majority of the reviewed papers show an increase in marker concentration in bladder cancer samples versus a control. Only a few of them provide quantitative information about MMP biomarkers in bladder tissue (cancerous and control tissue), and none give such information about cathepsins. Levels of the order of µg/g protein are characteristic of MMP biomarkers in urinary bladder tissue. Most reported concentrations of proteases in blood serum/plasma and urine are at levels of ng/mL, both cancerous and control samples. It is concluded that the reviewed papers do not provide a clear picture concerning the use of proteases as bladder cancer biomarkers or concerning the levels of particular proteases in control samples. Potential new analytical tools for protease determination are discussed. More work in this area is necessary, especially by scientists equipped with new analytical tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.