ArticleCancers2025
Cold Atmospheric Plasma Selectively Targets Neuroblastoma: Mechanistic Insights and In Vivo Validation.
Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A dual-index framework for cold atmospheric plasma dosing: A meta-analysis of parametric control from volumetric redox flux to redox homeostatic status.Redox biology · 2026Pooled it
- Inhibitory effects of cold atmospheric plasma-activated solution on cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNeuroblastoma (NB) presents significant challenges in pediatric oncology, particularly in high-risk cases where local recurrence occurs in ~35% of patients. Cold Atmospheric Plasma (CAP) has emerged as a promising treatment due to its selective cytotoxicity toward cancer cells while sparing normal cells.
methodsThis study assessed CAP efficacy using in vitro NB cell lines (SK-N-AS and LAN-5) and in vivo xenograft murine models. In vitro, CAP was applied via a helium jet, and cellular responses were evaluated for viability, reactive oxygen species (ROS), lipid peroxidation, DNA damage, and cell cycle, while apoptosis was measured by Annexin V/PI flow cytometry. In vivo, CAP was applied to unresected tumors and residual tumors after incomplete resection. Tumor regrowth was monitored, and histological analysis was performed.
resultsCAP reduced NB cell viability in a dose- and time-dependent manner by increasing intracellular ROS and lipid peroxidation. CAP-treated NB cells showed a 50% rise in oxidative DNA damage, a two-fold increase in apoptosis, and alterations in cell-cycle progression, while normal fibroblasts showed modest effects. CAP predominantly induced apoptosis, though secondary necrosis appeared with prolonged exposures, consistent with caspase-3 and PARP pathways. In xenografts, CAP reduced tumor diameter by 60% and increased caspase-3-positive cells, with minimal effects on normal tissue.
conclusionsCAP demonstrates strong therapeutic potential as a targeted, non-invasive NB treatment, particularly for residual tumors near vascular structures with consistent exposure times (60-300 s).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.