Review on Metal Powder Manufactured by Technologies Utilizing Centrifugal Force.

Zhining Wu, Xianke Lu, Qi Shi, Yuyuan Zhao

Abstract readReview

In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhining WuSchool of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Ningbo University of Technology, Ningbo 315211, China.

Xianke LuSchool of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Ningbo University of Technology, Ningbo 315211, China.

Qi ShiSchool of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Ningbo University of Technology, Ningbo 315211, China.

Yuyuan ZhaoSchool of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Ningbo University of Technology, Ningbo 315211, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2356-8435

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Ningbo Municipality 2024J432

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-quality powders with spherical particles and controllable properties can be produced using centrifugal force. This review provides a comparative analysis of two centrifugal atomization techniques: the plasma rotating electrode process (PREP) and centrifugal atomization (CA). It systematically examines the fundamental principles, film disintegration modes, and the resultant powder characteristics, with a focus on mechanisms that lead to common defects. By evaluating current technological limitations and highlighting potential pathways for advancement, this review aims to offer valuable insights for the future development of high-quality, spherical metal powders for advanced manufacturing applications.

Indexed as

centrifugal atomizationdisintegration modemetal atomizationplasma rotating electrode processpowder characterization

Identifiers

PMID41227864

DOI10.3390/ma18214905

PMCPMC12608260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.