ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Computational Modelling of a Prestressed Tensegrity Core in a Sandwich Panel.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tensegrity structures, by definition composed of compressed members suspended in a network of tensile cables, are characterised by a high strength-to-weight ratio and the ability to undergo reversible deformations. Their application as cores of sandwich panels represents an innovative approach to lightweight design, enabling the regulation of mechanical properties while reducing material consumption. This study presents a finite element modelling procedure that combines analytical determination of prestress using singular value decomposition with implementation in the ABAQUS™ 2019 software. Geometry generation and prestress definitions were automated with Python 3 scripts, while algebraic analysis of individual modules was performed in Wolfram Mathematica. Two models were investigated: M1, composed of four identical modules, and M2, composed of four modules arranged in two mirrored pairs. Model M1 exhibited a linear elastic response with a constant global stiffness of 13.9 kN/mm, stable regardless of the prestress level. Model M2 showed nonlinear hardening behaviour with variable stiffness ranging from 0.135 to 1.1 kN/mm and required prestress to ensure static stability. Eigenvalue analysis confirmed the full stability of M1 and the increase in stability of M2 upon the introduction of prestress. The proposed method enables precise control of prestress distribution, which is crucial for the stability and stiffness of tensegrity structures. The M2 configuration, due to its sensitivity to prestress and variable stiffness, is particularly promising as an adaptive sandwich panel core in morphing structures, adaptive building systems, and deployable constructions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.