ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Meat Adulteration in the MENA and GCC Regions: A Scoping Review of Risks, Detection Technologies, and Regulatory Challenges.
Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of Species-Specific Peptide Markers in Highly Processed Meat Products Using De Novo Sequencing.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A fully integrated magnetofluidic system enabled by a wax phase barrier for automated multiplex meat adulteration detection.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMeat adulteration poses serious public health, economic, and religious concerns, particularly in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) and Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) regions where halal authenticity is essential. While isolated studies have reported undeclared species in meat products, a comprehensive regional synthesis of prevalence, detection technologies, and regulatory responses has been lacking.
methodsThis scoping review followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from database inception to 15 September 2025 was conducted using controlled vocabulary (MeSH) and free-text terms. Eligible studies included laboratory-based investigations of meat adulteration in MENA and GCC countries. Data were charted on study characteristics, adulteration types, detection methods, and regulatory context.
resultsOut of 50 records screened, 35 studies were included, covering 27 MENA/GCC countries. Prevalence of adulteration varied widely, from 5% in UAE surveillance studies to 66.7% in Egyptian native sausages. Undeclared species most frequently detected were poultry, donkey, equine, pig, and dog. Molecular methods, particularly PCR and qPCR, were most widely applied, followed by ELISA and spectroscopy. Recent studies introduced biosensors, AI-assisted spectroscopy, and blockchain traceability, but adoption in regulatory practice remains limited.
conclusionsMeat adulteration in the MENA and GCC regions is localized and product-specific rather than uniformly widespread. Detection technologies are advancing, yet regulatory enforcement and halal-sensitive verification remain fragmented. Strengthening laboratory capacity, harmonizing regional standards, and investing in portable biosensors, AI-enhanced spectral tools, and blockchain-based traceability are critical for consumer trust, halal integrity, and food safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.