Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41227711›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Revisiting Key Performance Indicators That Evaluate Food Safety Management Systems: A Short Review.

Ilija Djekic, Nada Smigic

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ilija DjekicFaculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, Nemanjina 6, 11080 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-8132-8299
Nada SmigicFaculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, Nemanjina 6, 11080 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-5245-1239

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main aim of this paper was to revisit scientific manuscripts and identify key food safety performance indicators that may be applicable in different types of food company. A total of 48 papers has been analyzed, and results show that indicators may be categorized as process-based, product-based, and company-based performance indicators. Process-based indicators analyzed the effectiveness of processes found in a majority of food companies such as hygiene, control, maintenance, storage, purchasing, and human resources. Product-based indicators were analyzed through the perspective of production effectiveness as the core process in all food companies. Company-based indicators were deployed in terms of indicators used to verify the effectiveness of the food safety system.

Indexed as

benchmarks and targetsfood processesfood safety 4.0food safety culturefood safety indicatorsverification and validation

Identifiers

PMID41227711
PMCPMC12607700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.