ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Risk Assessment of Dietary Exposure to Fluoride from Follow-On Milk Consumption.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breastfeeding based on the use of follow-on milk may contain traces of xenobiotic elements that could pose a risk to the health of the vulnerable population for which it is intended. Fluorine is a non-essential element that, at high concentrations, can produce adverse health effects such as dental fluorosis, decreased IQ (intelligence quotient), thyroid alterations, and kidney damage. Given the vulnerability of infants and the possible presence of fluoride in this type of product, the content of this anion was determined in a total of 46 samples of follow-on milk from different brands and types (starter, follow-on, and hydrolysate formulas) using a fluoride ion-selective electrode (EWI). The highest mean concentration of fluoride was recorded in the hydrolysate formulas (3.38 ± 2.78 mg/L). The dietary intake assessment indicated that some brands of hydrolyzed formulas could pose a health risk, providing up to 94.1% of the UL (upper level) with only one 90 mL serving in the 0-6-month age group. It is recommended that consumers be aware of the fluoride content in the water used to prepare bottles, as it can further increase total fluoride intake and therefore pose a risk to the health of infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.