In one paragraphArticle in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from itWhat it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
8 authors.
Laura Rabasco-VílchezDepartment of Food Science and Technology, UIC Zoonosis y Enfermedades Emergentes ENZOEM, ceiA3, Universidad de Córdoba, 14014 Córdoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0287-840X Araceli BolívarDepartment of Food Science and Technology, UIC Zoonosis y Enfermedades Emergentes ENZOEM, ceiA3, Universidad de Córdoba, 14014 Córdoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8488-8750 María Julia RuizLaboratorio de Inmunoquímica y Biotecnología, Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil (CIVETAN), CONICET, CICPBA, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, UNICEN-Campus Universitario, Tandil B7000, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-8402-870X Narjes HarraziResearch Laboratory "Technological Innovation and Food Security-LR22 AGR01", Higher Institute of Food Industries of Tunisia (ESIAT), University of Carthage, Tunis 1002, Tunisia.ORCID 0000-0001-9127-9956 Jérôme MounierINRAE, Laboratoire Universitaire de Biodiversité et Écologie Microbienne, University Brest, F-29280 Plouzane, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8290-6898 Emmanuel CotonINRAE, Laboratoire Universitaire de Biodiversité et Écologie Microbienne, University Brest, F-29280 Plouzane, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0912-8804 Luis M MedinaDepartment of Food Science and Technology, UIC Zoonosis y Enfermedades Emergentes ENZOEM, ceiA3, Universidad de Córdoba, 14014 Córdoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0322-4037 Fernando Pérez-RodríguezDepartment of Food Science and Technology, UIC Zoonosis y Enfermedades Emergentes ENZOEM, ceiA3, Universidad de Córdoba, 14014 Córdoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1016-5725 Funding
European Union and MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 PRIMA-S2-2019-PCI2020-112015European Union and MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 PRIMA-S2-2023/PCI2024-153453MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 RED2022-134545-T (OneHealth4Food)
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
This study explores tomato agri-food residues as sources of bacteria with bioprotective potential to enhance product shelf-life and safety. A total of 245 bacterial strains were isolated, comprising predominantly
Indexed as
acidic conditionsantifungalantimicrobialBacillusbio-preservationisolatelactic acid bacteriapost-harvestPseudomonasshelf-life
Identifiers
PMID41227688
PMCPMC12607484
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390