ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Nutritional Evaluation of Plant-Based Meat and Sausage Analogues.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plant-Based Diets in Adolescence: Cardiometabolic Benefits, Developmental Risks, and the Role of Fortification.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Article
- Physicochemical Properties of Safflower (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Plant-based meat substitutes on the German market: a characterization based on declared nutrient contents, Nutri-Score, organic and vegan labeling, and use of iodized salt.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant-based meat and sausage analogues (PBMAs) are gaining popularity due to growing concerns about the health, environmental, and ethical impacts of animal-based foods. In the present study, we compared the nutritional quality of 298 PBMAs to 294 animal-based reference products available on the German retail market in 2024 across nine subcategories. PBMAs generally contained less total fat, saturated fat, and protein, but more fibre, carbohydrates, and sugar compared to meat products. Notably, most meat analogues exhibited higher salt contents. Nutri-Scores of PBMAs were significantly favourable in six subcategories. Among PBMAs, approximately 60% demonstrated good protein quality, while only 12% were fortified with key micronutrients, including vitamin B12 or iron. Most PBMAs contained one or more additives and flavourings. These findings suggest that while PBMAs often offer favourable nutritional profiles, reformulation and clearer nutritional guidance could help to further support the emergence of healthier plant-based options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.