Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41227623›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Structural and Functional Properties of Underutilised Cowpea and Moth Bean Starches.

Weiyan Xiong, Minqian Zhu, Surya P Bhattarai, Sushil Dhital

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Weiyan XiongDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Monash University, Clayton Campus, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia.
Minqian ZhuDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Monash University, Clayton Campus, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia.
Surya P BhattaraiInstitute for Future Farming Systems, CQUniversity, Australia, Rockhampton, QLD 4701, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8095-3685
Sushil DhitalDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Monash University, Clayton Campus, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Starches isolated as by-products from protein extraction of three cowpea and three moth bean cultivars were investigated for their structural and functional properties, including particle size, apparent amylose content (AAC), crystallinity, gelatinisation and retrogradation behaviour, pasting properties, and gel texture. Cowpea starches exhibited higher AAC, gelatinisation temperatures, retrogradation enthalpy, and gel strength, indicating greater thermal stability and stronger gel network formation. In contrast, moth bean starches showed lower ACC, higher relative crystallinity, and greater gelatinisation enthalpy, reflecting more compact native crystalline structures, due to a higher amylopectin content. The lower AAC of moth beans resulted in limited retrogradation and softer gels. To evaluate the multivariate relationships among the starch samples, cluster analysis was performed, which grouped the samples according to botanical origin. This classification underscored the distinct structural and functional attributes differentiating cowpea and moth bean starches. These findings provide insight into cultivar-dependent starch behaviour. Cowpea starches may be suited for applications requiring thermal stability and a firm texture, such as noodle formulations and microwave foods, while moth bean starches offer potential for products with smooth textures and low retrogradation, such as in instant or ready-to-eat food products.

Indexed as

cowpeamoth beanphysicochemical propertiesstarch

Identifiers

PMID41227623
PMCPMC12607483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.