ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Rootstock Influence on Wine Aroma Compounds and Sensory Perception: A Review.
Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of Rootstock and Exogenous Plant Growth Regulators on Volatile Aroma Profiles and Terpenoid-Mediated Defense in Table Grape Fruit.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rootstocks play a crucial role in viticulture because of both their agronomic benefits and impact on grape and wine chemical composition. Their influence on vigor, yield, and phenolic maturity has been widely studied, but only recently have studies begun to examine their effects on wine aroma compounds and sensory profiles. This review compiles findings of studies investigating 33 rootstocks for their influence on wine aroma composition and 29 rootstocks for sensory evaluation across 10 red and four white grape varieties. The most studied rootstocks include 1103 Paulsen, 110 Richter, Sélection Oppenheim 4 and 101-14 Millardet et de Grasset. Shiraz, Merlot, and Cabernet-Sauvignon are the most frequently assessed varieties. Despite growing works in this research area, results are highly variable due to differences in experimental design, winemaking protocols, and sensory methodologies. Only five studies have simultaneously analyzed both wine aroma compounds and sensory attributes. While some consistent trends emerge for certain aroma compounds, such as β-damascenone or linalool, most findings remain context-dependent. This review emphasizes a lack of standardization, including that of winemaking conditions, and highlights the critical need for multi-site, multi-year studies to better understand rootstock effects on wine aroma and sensory quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.