Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41227555›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Effects of

Huiying Wang, Guangquan Li, Xianze Wang, Shaoming Gong, Daqian He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Huiying WangInstitute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Science, Shanghai 201106, China.
Guangquan LiInstitute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Science, Shanghai 201106, China.
Xianze WangInstitute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Science, Shanghai 201106, China.
Shaoming GongInstitute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Science, Shanghai 201106, China.
Daqian HeInstitute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Science, Shanghai 201106, China.

Funding

the China Agriculture Research System CARS-42-35the Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences excellent team building program 2022-021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the role of ganoderma lucidum polysaccharides (GLP) in mitigating dexamethasone (DEX)-induced immune injury in goslings. Dexamethasone (DEX) is commonly used to establish an animal model of immune suppression, which mimics the immune injury caused by stress or certain pathological conditions in poultry. A total of 180 one-day-old goslings were randomly assigned to three groups: control (Con), DEX, and DEX + GLP, with six replicates of 10 goslings each. The Con and DEX groups were fed a basal diet, whereas the DEX + GLP group received feed supplemented with 0.2% GLP. From days 14 to 21, the DEX and DEX + GLP groups were injected with 3.5 mg/kg body weight (BW) of DEX, while the Con group received normal saline. Growth performance, immune organ indices, serum parameters, organ morphology, and intestinal microbiota were evaluated at 21 and 35 days. At day 21, the Con group exhibited significantly higher BW, average daily gain (ADG), spleen, thymus, and bursa indices, as well as serum total protein (TP), albumin (ALB), globulin (GLOB), IL-6, IgA, and IgG compared to the DEX and DEX + GLP groups (

Indexed as

cecal microbial diversityGanoderma lucidum polysaccharidesgoslinggrowthimmuneserum biochemical markers

Identifiers

PMID41227555
PMCPMC12609862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.