Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41227549›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

The Constructional Approach to Zoo Animal Training: Enhancing Welfare Through Emerging Evidence-Based Behavioral Science.

Barbara Heidenreich, Annette Pedersen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Barbara HeidenreichAnimal Training Fundamentals, Austin, TX 78745, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-1635-0358
Annette PedersenCopenhagen Zoo, Roskildevej 38, 2000 F, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal welfare has become a cornerstone of modern zoo and aquarium animal care practices. This paper introduces the constructional approach to animal training as an evidence-based framework that can enhance the welfare of zoo animals. Developed through decades of behavioral science research and practical applications, the constructional approach emphasizes building desirable behaviors rather than eliminating problematic ones, avoiding reduction-based techniques, utilizing comprehensive contingency analysis, incorporating genuine choice, and addressing emotional welfare through contingency management. This review systematically examines the foundational principles of the constructional approach, distinguishes it from traditional animal training methodologies, presents case examples of successful implementation in zoo settings, and provides practical recommendations for zoo professionals. Methods included a narrative review of peer-reviewed literature, unpublished academic works, and documented applications in zoological settings. The results demonstrate that constructional programs offer notable advantages over commonly promoted hierarchical models of behavior change procedures, which often prescribe sequential application of techniques without adequate consideration of behavioral function. By adopting constructional programs, zoos can more effectively meet their overriding goals of providing optimal welfare, supporting conservation efforts, facilitating research, and enhancing educational experiences-all while prioritizing compassionate care that respects the agency and well-being of animals.

Indexed as

animal traininganimal welfareassentcompassionconstructional approachfunctional assessmentgenuine choicenegative reinforcementnonlinear contingency analysispositive reinforcement

Identifiers

PMID41227549
PMCPMC12607310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.