Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41227508›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

What Does That Head Tilt Mean? Brain Lateralization and Sex Differences in the Processing of Familiar Human Speech by Domestic Dogs.

Colleen Buckley, Courtney L Sexton, George Martvel, Erin E Hecht, Brenda J Bradley, Anna Zamansky, Francys Subiaul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Colleen BuckleyCenter for the Advanced Study of Human Paleobiology, Department of Anthropology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20007, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-6656-0053
Courtney L SextonCenter for the Advanced Study of Human Paleobiology, Department of Anthropology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20007, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0174-7459
George MartvelDepartment of Information Systems, University of Haifa, Haifa 31905, Israel.ORCID 0009-0009-2602-2041
Erin E HechtDepartment of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1247-0432
Brenda J BradleyCenter for the Advanced Study of Human Paleobiology, Department of Anthropology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
Anna ZamanskyDepartment of Information Systems, University of Haifa, Haifa 31905, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-8350-4068
Francys SubiaulCenter for the Advanced Study of Human Paleobiology, Department of Anthropology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20007, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5873-9524

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Does the head tilt observed in many domesticated dogs index lateralized language processing? To answer this question, the present study evaluated household dogs responding to four conditions in which owners provided an increasing number of communicative cues. These cues ranged from no communicative/affective cues to rich affective cues coupled with dog-directed speech. Dogs' facial responses were first coded manually using the Dog Facial Action Coding System (DogFACS), followed by an in-depth investigation of head tilt behavior, in which AI-based automated analysis of head tilt and audio analysis of acoustic features extracted from communicative cues were implemented. In a sample of 103 dogs representing seven breed groups and mixed-breed dogs, we found significant differences in the number of head tilts occurring between conditions, with the most communicative (last) condition eliciting the most head tilts. There were also significant differences in the direction of the head tilts and between sex groups. Dogs were more likely to tilt their heads to the right, and neutered male dogs were more likely to tilt their heads than spayed female dogs. The right-tilt bias is consistent with left-hemisphere language processing in humans, with males processing language in a more lateralized manner, and females processing language more bilaterally-a pattern also observed in humans. Understanding the canine brain is important to both evolutionary research through a comparative lens, and in understanding our interspecies relationship.

Indexed as

dog cognitioninterspecies communicationlanguage processingsocial communication

Identifiers

PMID41227508
PMCPMC12609352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.