Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41227471›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Research Methods for the Analysis of Visual Emotion Cues in Animals: A Workshop Report.

Catia Correia-Caeiro, Anna Zamansky, Sabrina Karl, Annika Bremhorst

Abstract readConference Proceedings
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Tail-rattling in rodents: more than a threat display.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Catia Correia-CaeiroHuman Biology & Primate Cognition, Institute of Biology, Leipzig University, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Anna ZamanskyTech4Animals Lab, Department of Information Systems, University of Haifa, Haifa 31905, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-8350-4068
Sabrina KarlFOUR PAWS International, 1150 Vienna, Austria.
Annika BremhorstTech4Animals Lab, Department of Information Systems, University of Haifa, Haifa 31905, Israel.

Funding

University of Bern APCs for the publication of the manuscript
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal emotions have been debated since Darwin's pioneering work on the expression of such states in humans and other animals. Lately, interest in measuring animal emotions has been growing. Hence, a scientific discussion on this topic was needed, which translated into the organisation of the first International Workshop on Research Methods for Animal Emotion Analysis (RM4AEA). The current work aims to provide a concise yet critical examination of the current knowledge and methodological approaches discussed during the workshop, with a primary focus on visual behaviours. Although establishing conceptual definitions poses an initial challenge when studying animal emotions, the key challenges are found when collecting data sets, and when interpreting and analysing the information contained therein. This work also offers insights and recommendations to address these challenges, drawn from the closing panel discussion. By synthesising recent developments and expert perspectives shared during the workshop, this report aims to foster continued dialogue within the scientific community.

Indexed as

AIanimalscommunicationemotionmethodsvisual behaviour

Identifiers

PMID41227471
PMCPMC12609227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.