ArticleCells2025
Secondhand Smoke Exposure Timing Triggers Distinct Placental Responses in Mouse Pregnancy.
Article in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Secondhand smoke (SHS), found in about 57.6% of global public areas as a widespread environmental hazard, has been associated with negative effects during pregnancy, such as preeclampsia (PE) and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). Our research investigated the impact of SHS on placental issues in a C57BL/6 model that simulates PE and IUGR in mice. We administered SHS to pregnant mice through a nose-only delivery method, beginning either on embryonic day 12.5 (prior to spiral artery (SA) invasion; labeled SHS-6D) or day 14.5 (following SA invasion; labeled SHS-4D), continuing up to E18.5. Control animals received only ambient air. We employed bulk RNA sequencing to assess and describe changes in placental gene expression patterns. For the SHS-4D group, which mimicked IUGR, compared to untreated controls, results showed elevated levels of inflammation-related genes (IL11RA, CHI3L1) alongside likely interference in pathways for antibody-triggered complement activation, marked by reduced expression of C1QA, C1QB, and C1QC. Immune profiling also indicated decreased macrophage activity in the placentas of the SHS-4D group relative to those from normal pregnancies at term. In contrast, the SHS-6D versus control analysis revealed lowered expression of collagen-related genes (COL1A1, COL4A5, COL4A6, COL17A1). Additionally, SHS-6D exhibited higher levels of genes associated with cell-based lysis processes compared to SHS-4D. An evaluation of the existing literature revealed that nearly every differentially expressed gene (DEG) identified in our work has been reported in studies associated with SHS exposure. Yet, few of these DEGs are discussed alongside PE or IUGR in prior reports, highlighting gaps in knowledge about how SHS triggers these conditions. Overall, we determined that the timing of SHS exposure in pregnant mice results in unique patterns of gene regulation and involvement in biological pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.