ReviewCells2025
Safety Assessment of Stem Cell-Based Therapies: Current Standards and Advancing Frameworks.
Review in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Engineering cardiac regeneration using stem cells: Cellular sources, differentiation signatures, targeted delivery, and functional recovery.Regenerative therapy · 2026Review
- Review
- From Bench to Bedside: Translational Barriers in Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for Intervertebral Disc Degeneration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Research Progress and Comparative Evaluation of Three Cutting-Edge Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Treatment Strategies: Biologics, Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction, and Stem Cell Therapies.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Review
- Repair and regeneration across the lifespan: an ontogenetic perspective.Frontiers in aging · 2026Review
- From pathophysiology to therapy: molecular mechanisms of stem cell and extracellular vesicle-mediated repair in diabetic peripheral neuropathy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Progressing Regenerative Medicine: Integrating Bioprinting Platforms for Stem Cell Applications.Stem cells international · 2026Review
- Knowledge and attitude of Malaysian university students towards regenerative medicine therapy and their clinical implications: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Stem cell and stem cell-derived extracellular vesicle therapy for traumatic brain injury: mechanisms, engineering and translation.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Regenerative medicine is a rapidly evolving field of contemporary biomedical research that offers new therapeutic strategies for conditions previously considered untreatable. Cell therapy shows particular potential in this domain. However, rigorous biosafety measures are required in its development and clinical application. This review proposes a practice-oriented biosafety framework for cell therapy, translating key risks into operational principles: toxicity, oncogenicity/tumorigenicity/teratogenicity, immunogenicity, biodistribution; and cell product quality. For each principle, preclinical approaches and regulatory expectations are summarized. Criteria for immunological safety are addressed, including activation of innate immunity (complement, T- and NK-cell responses) and the need for HLA typing. Biodistribution assessment involves the use of quantitative PCR and imaging techniques (PET, MRI) to monitor cell fate over time. The risks of oncogenicity, tumorigenicity, and teratogenicity can be analyzed using a combination of in vitro methods and in vivo models in immunocompromised animals. Product quality assessment includes sterility, identity, potency, viability, and genetic stability, with alignment of procedures to regulatory requirements and an emphasis on quality-by-design principles to ensure safe and reproducible clinical use. Integrating toxicity and safety pharmacology data supports a balanced risk-benefit assessment and clinical trial planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.