ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Personalized Approaches to Patients with Intra-Abdominal Infections.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of dexmedetomidine, haloperidol, and propofol sedation on intra-abdominal pressure, inflammatory response, and clinical outcomes in patients with abdominal sepsis: A randomised controlled study.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Aztreonam-avibactam therapy following surgical source control forFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a prognostic model for acute respiratory distress syndrome in critically Ill patients with intra-abdominal sepsis: a multicenter cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) continue to be an important cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The optimal management of patients with IAIs relies on early and accurate diagnosis, prompt and adequate source control, appropriate antimicrobial therapy based on the PK/PD principles, as well as hemodynamic support with intravenous fluids and vasopressors in critically ill patients. This narrative review aims to suggest five basic factors which should always be considered when assessing patients with IAIs to provide the most adequate treatment. These factors include the anatomical extent of the infection, the origin of the infection, the patient's clinical status, the suspected pathogens and their resistance profiles, and immune competence. The continuous assessment of these elements is essential in managing complicated IAIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.