ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Refining the Clinical Pathway for Nasotracheal Intubation: An Updated Decision Making Algorithm.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nasotracheal Versus Orotracheal Intubation in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective Study.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nasotracheal Intubation (NTI) is a common route of airway management in many situations. Over the years, numerous techniques and approaches have been described in performing NTI safely and effectively, including many innovative techniques being published in recent years. However, there hasn't been a summary of the recent approaches to NTI, especially in an easy, clinically applicable decision making format. In fact, the last algorithmic approach to nasal intubation in the literature was published in 2008. This comprehensive review details an updated analysis of NTI techniques along with a new adapted algorithmic outline to approach NTI in a methodical and stepwise manner. There is also an extensive review of techniques to control epistaxis, which is the most commonly encountered complication during NTI. The newly adapted NTI algorithm simplifies the initial approach to three options: Routine Asleep NTI, Awake NTI, and an Initial Orotracheal Intubation (OTI) followed by Conversion to NTI. Older techniques, such as blind NTI, flexible intubation scope guided, "look before you leap" approach and cuff inflation technique, are discussed along with incorporation of newer techniques, such as videolaryngoscope guided, hybrid, alignment approach, and OTI to NTI conversion. Uniquely, this manuscript reviews all published techniques for converting OTI to NTI and categorizes them into two pathways: direct conversion (with glottic visualization) or indirect conversion (without glottic visualization). Furthermore, original animated videos have been created and attached to help elucidate these conversion techniques visually.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.