ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2025
Multinodular Hydropic Leiomyoma in a 41-Year-Old Patient: A Case Report.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Uterine leiomyomas are a heterogenous group of benign mesenchymal tumours. While diagnosis is usually achieved through clinical assessment and pelvic ultrasound (PU), atypical subtypes are not as easily recognisable and can be mistaken for malignant tumours such as leiomyosarcoma or ovarian carcinoma. We describe the case of a 41-year-old patient who presented with increasing bulk symptoms, urinary frequency and growth of a hydropic leiomyoma (HLM) of the left lateral and posterior uterine wall that had been known for 10 years, confirmed with previous biopsy. The tumour filled the entire pelvic cavity in PU and was increasingly difficult to delineate; therefore an abdominal hysterectomy without oophorectomy was performed. Gross tissue examination showed an irregularly enlarged, asymmetric uterus with an intrauterine subserosal mass and an extrauterine papillary tumour arising from the right and posterior uterine wall. The tumour measured 20 × 17 × 10 cm in size. Numerous smooth muscle nodules were observed within the uterus and extending into the extrauterine component in a continuous transition, exhibiting a benign, bland appearance. The nodules were separated by abundant edematous connective tissue with increased vascularization. Histopathological analysis revealed low mitotic activity with no evidence of nuclear atypia, pleomorphism, or necrosis. Immunohistochemical staining confirmed the diagnosis of a benign smooth muscle tumour. Our findings confirm a rare, benign smooth muscle neoplasm with both intrauterine and extrauterine involvement, and add to the existing literature regarding presentation, diagnostic and therapeutic challenges associated with HLM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.