ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Laparoscopy in the Surgical Management of Gynecological Cancer: A Comprehensive Update.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Surgical approach selection and perioperative-pathological characteristics in endometrial cancer: a retrospective observational study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A laparoscopic approach has been incorporated into the surgical management of a great variety of gynecologic pathologies during the decades following the first description of the method. As knowledge and experience about the use of laparoscopy is accumulating, it is gradually being recognized as an oncologically safe and effective option for the surgical management of various types of gynecological cancer, and the indications for its applications are increasing, as controversial topics are resolved through research. Endometrial cancer is the gynecological malignancy with the most straightforward indications of laparoscopy in its treatment, since a minimally invasive approach is considered the standard of care for both the surgical treatment of early-stage disease and surgical staging through sentinel lymph node biopsy. The role of laparoscopy was significantly decreased in the surgical management of cervical cancer after the publication of the LACC trial which reported worse survival outcomes for patients treated with laparoscopy, and laparotomy has emerged as the preferred approach. However, laparoscopy can be acceptable for carefully selected cases of early-stage cervical cancer and has also been introduced as an effective method for the surgical staging of the disease. The use of laparoscopy in the diagnostic and therapeutic management of ovarian cancer is not fully established but is receiving growing attention, as increasing evidence supports the safety of this approach, especially in the treatment of early-stage disease, where it is considered an acceptable alternative approach to laparotomy. Finally, as laparoscopic advancements are continuously achieved, new indications for laparoscopy have been explored for both vulvar and breast cancer. Future research will identify and highlight new ways to further integrate laparoscopy into the diagnostic and therapeutic management of gynecological malignancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.