ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
The Use of Ultrasound Imaging in Continuous Blood Vessel Area and Velocity Data Acquisition for Determining the Local Pulse Wave Velocity.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- First-Principles Calculations and PMUT Applications of Piezoelectric Thin-Film Materials.Micromachines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulse wave velocity (PWV) is a useful biomarker in the monitoring and risk stratification of various cardiovascular diseases including hypertension. The current gold standard for non-invasive measurement is carotid-femoral PWV (cfPWV) measurement via direct tonometry. However, cfPWV provides only a global PWV measure, which emphasises the need for an alternative capable of local PWV assessment. There are several alternatives for local PWV measurement proposed in the literature and one promising alternative is ultrasound, which offers good penetration depth, accessibility, and a relatively low cost, making it well-suited for non-invasive, real-time acquisition of haemodynamic parameters for PWV estimation. This paper aims to evaluate the different approaches for ultrasound-based acquisition while considering technical and physiological constraints to optimise the accuracy, reliability, and reproducibility of the parameters collected for estimation. In particular, this paper focuses on the flow-area (QA) and lnDiameter-velocity (lnDU) methods, which require local area and velocity data for PWV estimation. Accordingly, this paper discusses the use of ultrasound imaging in vessel data acquisition, highlights various challenges and considerations to be managed during acquisition and processing, outlines the different ultrasound-based imaging modalities for acquiring area and velocity data, and compares the simultaneous and non-simultaneous acquisition of data for PWV estimation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.